exelent!!!!!!!!1

private GetNextRandom() {
Random r = new Random();
int next = r.Next();
}

There are two problems with this approach:
1. The Random object is created everytime the object is called, wasting system resources;
2. The default seed is not suitable if this method is called many times in a second. Two calls in the same second will retrieve the same value from this sample, because the seed to the Random (when using the default constructor) is the current second on system time.

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.random.aspx

The best approach, in my opinion, is to create a class to generate Random numbers with static methods, and you should also have a static Random class initialized only once.

I want to generate an array 5 random numbers between a range ( say min to max).

gak ngerti !

nice tutorial, tq so much.

makasih2

gini aja ga ngerti... cmn kek fungsi rand di C

we need to write a program about poker game...and they said we're going to use random function.

I use this for random generation. Random class should take 32 bit as random value but takes only 30 bits..dont know why. This generates random seed from system time.

1. Initalize App
2. Create Random class (only once in beginning of the app OR series of random numbers)
Random randobj = new Random(Convert.ToInt32(DateTime.Now.Ticks % 0x7FFFFFFF));
3. Exit

Works fine for me. 0x80000000 generates Overflow error. Not Random but the exakt value 0x800000.
So You should Only use values 0 to 0x7FFFFFFF as the seed. (0x7FFFFFFF = 2147483647 (decimal))

Every results in this tutorial are not true. They are only true when you're debuging. Why look on
second point of Ravi Wallau comment.
This code
Random randNum = new Random();

randNum.NextDouble();

randNum.NextDouble();

randNum.NextDouble();

This will generate 3 equal doubles.

Commnet to Ravi Wallau.
"(when using the default constructor) is the current second on system time."
As far as I know is nanosecond = DataTime.Now.Ticks. However 2 point you made is correct.

My solution for finding random for some colection is pseudocode
for(int x=0;x<someCollection.length;x )
{
Random r= new Random(DateTime.Now.Ticks * (x 1));
r.getNextDouble();
}
Any ideas for more efficient solution. This solution
is wasting system resources ( random generated every step in loop).

sry.. My solution is

My solution for finding random for some colection is pseudocode
for(int x=0;x<someCollection.length;x )
{
Random r= new Random(DateTime.Now.Ticks * (x 1));
r.getNextDouble();
}

.. so i'm creating seed using DateTime.Now.Ticks
and combining it with other value for each item in collection.

Where da hell are " " characters

My solutution is for those cases you need a good "start" seed for a long series of random numbers, because the numbers in the random class is random itself. The most important thing is NOT to shuffle in the random number array BUT to get different startpoints in the random array.

So i think my solution is pretty good... i think the Random Class is misunderstood. Dont shuffle but get different starting points because the numbers NEXT to your starting poits IS random for your application.

My solutution is for those cases you need a good "start" seed for a long series of random numbers, because the numbers in the random class is random itself. The most important thing is NOT to shuffle in the random number array BUT to get different startpoints in the random array.

So i think my solution is pretty good... i think the Random Class is misunderstood. Dont shuffle but get different starting points because the numbers NEXT to your starting poits IS random for your application.

Ok...saw that now. The default constructor Takes the system time as seed.

Thats ok then. Cant see the point to shuffle .. just create the Random class with def constructor and go on with Random.next.

Question to Risto Karhu:

so

Random r1 = new Random();
Random r2 = new Random();

r1.NextDouble() will give the same as r2.NextDouble()

-----
Random r1 = new Random();
double first r1.NextDouble();
double second r1.NextDouble();

first and second will give different results
?????

This article has changed since I wrote my first comment a while ago, the method GetNextRandom() was removed from the code sample, which invalidates my comment in the top of this thread.

The article at MSDN provides valuable information about this: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.random.aspx

Piotr, the Random class, when constructed using the default constructor (no parameters), create a random object using the default constructor that uses the system time. As the code is executed very fast, both instances are seeded with the same value, therefore generating the same sequence numbers. But if you use the same object to generate two numbers in sequence, then you will have different results.

The pseudo-random numbers (they are not truly random as they are algorithm-based, algorithm that is initialized with a number) can be used in this way when you need random numbers to build a geme or something similar. The one thing to keep in mind is that someone VERY interested in breaking on your application may guess the next random number generated by it, if he/ she knows a number of previous random numbers.

For example, if a person knows that you used the default Random constructor and that it's constructed, let's say, when the application starts, then he/ she could initialize many random classes with all the possible seeds for the past, let's say, 30 minutes, and cross that information with the numbers that your application has constructed until he/ she finds the right sequence of numbers. With that information, one could certainly guess what would be the next generated random number.

Well, when you need "realy" random numbers, you should check this: http://random.org/

cu!

I get well help using this code. thanks for giving the code for random function.

I get well help using this code. thanks for giving the code for random function.